rethinking our feelings

Study: Cognitive Regulation Fails Stress Test

by The SETI Staff on September 22, 2014

A study published by the National Academy of Sciences has challenged the assumption that we can “rethink our feelings” under stress. After analyzing their results, the researchers chose a title for their work that tells you exactly where they stand: “Cognitive emotion regulation fails the stress test.

Here at the Somatic Experiencing® Trauma Institute, we absolutely believe, as one of our practitioners recently termed it, that “to get to emotional regulation, you need to go beyond cognitive.” In other words, when faced with real pressures of trauma and stress, we can’t simply think our way around or through them. Prevention and healing of unhealthy traumatic responses requires a convergence of mind and body, to say nothing of our more ephemeral facets. It is not merely a chore for the brain.

The researchers of this 2013 study, representing five different institutions from NYU to Stanford, noticed that cognitive regulation only seemed to work in theory, or in the lab, but not so much in real life. So they set out to put it to a stress test. For those interested in the methodology, the study might be summarized as follows:

  1. Participants received “fear conditioning,” learning the difference between two forms of stimuli they would be encountering: one negative and one neutral.
  2. Immediately after, they all received cognitive regulation training, learning to consciously regulate their fear responses.
  3. The next day all participants undertook a “fear conditioning task,” an opportunity to test their new regulation training. Notably, some had been pre-stressed while others, a control group, encountered the task unstressed.
  4. The researchers confirmed fear arousal via skin conductance (sweat output) and fear response via certain enzymes and hormones in the saliva, generally accepted as markers of stress response.

The results showed that, when facing fear-inducing stimuli, those individuals who were not stressed did benefit from their new skills but those under stress saw no benefit from the cognitive regulation training. The researchers concluded: “Stress markedly impairs the cognitive regulation of emotion and highlights critical limitations of this technique to control affective responses under stress.”

Read the abstract (or the full study) and please comment below with your thoughts.

Photo by CJS*64 via Compfight cc


SE's new faculty member

Meet SE Trauma Institute’s Newest Faculty Member

by Abi Blakeslee August 11, 2014

My journey to becoming SE® faculty began with a love for ice cream. When I was around five years old, my aunt would buy me not just a scoop but a “Matterhorn,” a multi-level tower of any flavor I wanted topped with chocolate sauce and whipped cream— if I would massage her tired shoulders. I […]

0 comments Read the full article →
healing reflection

Using a Hand Mirror to Work with Collision Trauma

by Jane Lazar July 21, 2014

Here’s a technique that came to me while working with a client who’d suffered a rear-end collision in her car with no warning. I was reflecting on the fact that she’d had no time to do any defensive orienting, when it occurred to me to use a hand-held mirror to allow her to see behind […]

2 comments Read the full article →
healing takes flight

A Psychotherapist Discusses Mindfulness and Trauma in the Body

by Laura Piché June 4, 2014

In this lively installment of SEPtalk, author, psychotherapist, and longtime Buddhist and yogic meditation practitioner Lisa Dale Miller explores how SE® enriches her work with patients. She’s a Somatic Experiencing® Practitioner and author of a new textbook on Buddhist psychology and its clinical applications. “Any psychotherapeutic professional who thinks they’re only working with the mind is […]

0 comments Read the full article →
Mindful awareness

Exploring Active Pause: Mindfulness and SE

by Serge Prengel April 28, 2014

What is mindfulness? In a previous entry, I provided Jon Kabat-Zinn’s definition: “paying attention in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally.” There is an elegant simplicity to this description, and this is probably why it has become so widely accepted as a definition of mindfulness. However, while it gives us […]

4 comments Read the full article →